Removing an Arrester from Service

Deciding on ‘end of life’ of an arrester in a power system can prove highly subjective given that this type of component can survive a long time without obvious loss of functionality. Of course, in cases where a dramatic electrical arcing event occurs, the decision is simple. Otherwise, as explains arrester expert, Jonathan Woodworth, a number of considerations need to be taken into account.

Functionality vs. Age

The purpose of an arrester is to protect other equipment and therefore still being able to meet this expected performance requirement should be integral in any decision to remove it from service. Another way to state this is that arrester life expectancy should be considered more from a functional than an age perspective.

Utilities typically expect substation equipment to have a service life of between 20 and 50 years. Assessing the continued functionality of an arrester in the absence of an end of life event can be done in service based on periodic routine thermal imaging as well as with temporary or permanent watt meters. If off-line, arresters can be checked with e.g. Doble testers. Therefore, before a removal decision is made, the arrester’s ongoing functionality should be assessed, assuming all other criteria are met.

Role of Sealing

Provided that the varistor elements are not overstressed, long service life is usually achievable, at least from the technical perspective. However, it is the condition of the enclosure and seals that will likely become the determining factor. For all surge arrester designs (i.e. both porcelain and polymeric housed), once the sealing system has deteriorated it can no longer protect the active elements from the external climate. Moisture ingress can then weaken the dielectric strength of the insulation within the assembly.

Reliability of seals depends on several factors, of which quality of manufacturing is high on the list. Even if the materials used have a long functional life, their reliability is ultimately subject to the influence of production defects. Estimating a likely life span for any sealing system can prove difficult for other reasons as well. For example, operating environment can play a decisive role in whether or not the arrester will achieve its full expected service life. Polymeric-housed arresters have now been in service for more than 30 years and, even with these, moisture ingress and sealing problems are sometimes an issue. Keeping the active elements free from moisture is key to longevity.

Safety Considerations

When the first polymeric distribution arrester was introduced in the late 1980s, observers were surprised at how fast this design became the industry standard. It has since become evident that even economics cannot drive change in the power sector as rapidly as does safety. For utilities that had been dealing with exploding porcelain arresters for decades, it was an easy decision to replace them with polymeric units to avoid risk of injury. Even today, the potential for an exploding end-of-life event should be seriously considered whenever raising the question of when an arrester should be removed from service.

In the case of substation arresters, conversion to polymeric housings has been far slower since the safety risk to the public is not perceived to be so high. Moreover, since these arresters are generally equipped with venting ports for pressure relief, there is less chance of explosion. Still, this risk for a porcelain-housed arrester increases if it is the practice of a utility to either automatically or manually restore power at a substation without first verifying its condition. Those utilities that follow this practice should ideally replace porcelain arresters with polymeric-housed units that have less explosive end-of-life events, even under severe conditions. To add to the risk, there are times when available system fault current may have been increased over time without consideration given to the capability of existing arresters. If these were installed e.g. 30 years ago, it is probable that they do not have the short circuit withstand needed. Indeed, risk of fragmenting porcelain should be seriously considered whenever deciding to replace an arrester.

Margin of Protection

Many times the removal question is answered by the fact that the arrester comes from the bygone era of silicon carbide technology. Arresters of this vintage simply cannot protect equipment as well as newer MOV technology.

The chart below demonstrates how protective characteristics have changed over the past 50-60 years. If old arresters are protecting even older and probably lower BIL equipment, the margin of protection calculation should be critical.


Jonathan Woodworth