Removing an Arrester from Service


As discussed in this edited contribution to INMR by Jonathan Woodworth, the answer to the question of when to remove an arrester from service is not always straightforward. A number of different considerations may need to be taken into account.

Functionality versus Age

Deciding on ‘end of life’ of an arrester in a power system can prove highly subjective because this type of component can survive for a long time without obvious loss of functionality. Of course, in those cases where a dramatic electrical arcing event occurs, the decision is simple. Since the purpose of an arrester is to protect other equipment, still being able to meet this expected performance requirement should be an integral part of any decision to remove it from service.

Thermal imaging can help identify arresters with incipient issues.

Another way to state this is that arrester life expectancy should be considered more from a functional than an age perspective. Utilities typically expect substation equipment to have a service life of between 20 and 50 years. Assessing the continued functionality of an arrester in the absence of an end of life event can be done in service with routine thermal imaging as well as with temporary or permanent watt meters. If off-line, arresters can be checked with e.g. Doble testers. Therefore, before a removal decision is made, the arrester’s ongoing functionality should be assessed, assuming all other criteria are met.


Role of Sealing

Provided that the varistor elements are not overstressed, from a technical perspective at least long service life is usually achievable. However, it is the condition of the enclosure and seals that will most likely become the determining factor. For all surge arrester designs (i.e. porcelain and polymeric), once the sealing system has deteriorated it can no longer protect the active elements from external climate. Moisture ingress can then weaken the dielectric strength of the insulation within the assembly.

Reliability of seals is subject to many factors, particularly quality of manufacturing. Even if the materials used have a long functional life, their reliability is ultimately subject to the influence of production defects. Estimating a likely life span for any sealing system can prove difficult for other reasons as well. For example, operating environment will play a decisive role in whether or not the arrester will achieve its expected service life. Polymeric-housed arresters have now been in service for more than 35 years and, even with these, moisture ingress and sealing problems are sometimes an issue. Keeping the active elements free from moisture is the key to longevity.


Safety Considerations

When the first polymeric distribution arrester was introduced in 1987, observers were surprised at how fast this design became the industry standard. It has since become evident that even economics cannot drive change in the power sector as rapidly as does safety. For utilities that had been dealing with exploding porcelain arresters for decades, it was an easy decision to replace them with polymeric units to avoid risk of injury. Even today, the potential for an exploding end-of-life event should be seriously considered whenever raising the question of when an arrester should be removed from service.

Different failure modes for porcelain and polymer-housed arresters.

In the case of substation arresters, conversion to polymeric housings has been far slower since the safety risk to the public is not perceived to be as high. Moreover, since these arresters are generally equipped with venting ports for pressure relief, there is less risk of explosion. Still, this risk for a porcelain-housed arrester increases if it is the practice of a utility to either automatically or manually restore power at a substation without first examining its condition. Those utilities that follow this practice should ideally replace porcelain arresters with polymeric-housed units that have less explosive end-of-life events, even under severe conditions. To add to the risk, there are times when available system fault current may have been increased over time with no consideration given to the capability of existing arresters. If they were installed e.g. 30 years ago, it is quite probable that they do not have the short circuit withstand needed. Indeed, the risk of fragmenting porcelain should be seriously considered whenever deciding when to replace an arrester.


Margin of Protection

Many times the removal question is answered by the fact that the arrester comes from the bygone era of silicon carbide technology. Arresters of this vintage simply cannot protect equipment as well as newer MOV technology. The chart below demonstrates how protective characteristics have changed over the past 60 years. If old arresters are protecting even older and probably lower BIL equipment, the margin of protection calculation could prove critical.




More about Hitachi Energy  
More about High Current Tests