Evaluating Reliability of Bushings

Resin-impregnated paper (RIP) bushings are now an established solution for many applications. Although such bushings are often referred to as ‘maintenance-free’, some of their parameters must nevertheless be monitored prior to putting them into service and also on a regular basis thereafter. Moreover, evaluating their reliability requires understanding certain physical parameters given that, unlike in oil-impregnated paper (OIP) bushings, the condenser core is solid. This edited past article contributed to INMR by Bernhard Heil of HSP Hochspannungsgeräte in Germany, reviewed relevant parameters for such evaluations.


Resin-impregnated paper (RIP) technology can now be applied for virtually all applications of bushings in the power industry. However, since the condenser core is solid and does not contain the oil found in OIP bushings, there are major differences when it comes to evaluating operational reliability.

bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings Examples of different types of RIP bushings
Fig. 1: Examples of different types of RIP bushings.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings RIP transformer bushings at   800 kV Chuxiong Substation in China and at substation in British Columbia
Fig. 2: RIP transformer bushings at ±800 kV Chuxiong Substation in China and at substation in British Columbia, Canada.

Dissolved gas analysis (DGA), for example, is a well-known methodology to evaluate the condition of OIP bushings. Partial breakdown between grading layers, however, is more difficult to use as a diagnostic for these bushings. This is because the failure mechanism might take place between two successive off-line measurements. Therefore, it is possible that nothing unusual is detected prior to sudden and rapid complete breakdown.

By contrast, in the case of RIP bushings there is no interaction between localized partial breakdown and the rest of the condenser core. Due to the material being solid, any partial breakdown is limited to its particular location. As such, the residual life of an RIP bushing after a first partial breakdown is usually much longer than for an OIP bushing. This means that detection of partial breakdown during offline measurement might be an adequate parameter to evaluate operational reliability.

Aside from capacitance, the power factor of a bushing is also an adequate parameter for diagnostic evaluation. But due to the different design of their condenser cores, the parameters influencing power factor are different for OIP and RIP bushings. For each evaluation, the influence of environmental conditions (e.g. stray capacitances, temperature) must be taken into account. Some parameters are influenced in the same way for OIP and RIP bushings while others are influenced differently. Understanding these influencing parameters is therefore important for each evaluation.  

Design of Bushings

Most typically, OIP bushings are equipped with porcelain insulators while RIP bushings have a composite insulator housing. The condenser core is manufactured using paper that is wound continuously while inserting aluminum foil in precise locations to build up capacitive grading of the electric field. After winding, the core is impregnated either with epoxy resin (RIP) or oil (OIP) under vacuum and heat.

OIP bushing with porcelain insulator (left); RIP bushing with composite insulator. bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings fig 4 1024x493
Fig. 3: OIP bushing with porcelain insulator (left); RIP bushing with composite insulator.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
Cutaway view of RIP bushing with composite insulator. bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings fig 5 1024x484
Fig. 4: Cutaway view of RIP bushing with composite insulator.
CLICK TO ENLARGE

Typically, the gap between the condenser core and outer composite insulator in an RIP bushing is filled with foam. Due to the hydrophobicity of silicone housing, cleaning prior to electrical measurement is usually not necessary.

Ageing

Under normal operating conditions, ageing of bushing is caused by electrical stress relative to its nominal voltage compared to any overvoltages, e.g. from lightning strike or switching operations. Accelerated ageing can then be due to unacceptably high overvoltages as well as by thermal stress and humidity ingress.

OIP insulation systems are particularly sensitive to overheating. For example, an increase of only 6K above maximum operating temperature will cause normal life expectancy to be cut in half. Moreover, humidity ingress will also have significant negative influence on service life. In fact, in the event of already greatly aged insulation, the whole system might fail subsequent to any partial breakdown. This could result in catastrophic failure should the bushing catch fire and involve the transformer as well.

bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings Breakdown of aged OIP bushing taken
Fig. 5: Breakdown of aged OIP bushing, taken out-of-service because of increased power factor, occurred during testing in HV laboratory without any indication prior to breakdown. In field, catastrophic failure would have been likely.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings inmr 1
Fig. 6: Partial breakdown happened with RIP bushing during operation (right). Since this is not just single partial breakdown but involves several grading layers, this failure probably took place over long time period. Indeed, this failure has been detected during scheduled outage by increase of capacitance. Thus, bushing could be replaced without catastrophic failure.
CLICK TO ENLARGE

Relevant Parameters for Evaluating OIP & RIP Bushings

It is well known that power factor and DGA are both adequate parameters to evaluate operational reliability of an OIP bushing. As discussed earlier, however, the relevant parameters for an RIP bushing are different, making it important to understand these and their possible influence.

A partial breakdown results in an increase in main capacitance C1, with the extent of increase dependent on number of short-circuited compared to total number of grading layers. The higher the bushing’s voltage level, the lower will be the increase in C1 in case of a single partial breakdown. Therefore, parameters influencing capacitance C1 must be taken into account during any evaluation, especially at higher voltages.

Even if the relative importance of any increase in C1 is different when evaluating OIP versus RIP bushings, the influencing parameters are the same for both technologies. The value of C1 is influenced by stray capacitance and temperature. Since stray capacitance is a geometrical parameter, keeping the set-up constant, will keep it constant as well. Therefore, a ‘fingerprint’ measurement after installing a bushing in its final position is the best reference for subsequent measurements. The temperature dependency of C1 for OIP and RIP bushings is 0.025 %/K and 0.04 %/K, respectively and this is usually only relevant in the case of very large temperature differences. For off-line measurements, the resulting deviation is mostly minor and can be neglected. Fig. 7 shows measurements for an aged OIP bushing heated in an oven to different temperatures. A temperature dependency of 0.025%/K results in an increase of C1 of 1.75% when heating the bushing from 20°C to 90°C, i.e. from 406 pF to 413 pF. Temperature dependency for the RIP bushing is somewhat higher (0.04%/K), however can also be mostly neglected in off-line measurements.

Temperature dependency of C1 of an OIP bushing. bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings fig8
Fig. 7: Temperature dependence of C1 of OIP bushing.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
Influence of stray capacitance on C2 in case of potential tap versus test tap. bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings fig9 300x226
Fig. 8: Influence of stray capacitance on C2 in case of potential tap versus test tap.
CLICK TO ENLARGE

Stray capacitance on test taps has stronger influence on C2 capacitance than on C1 capacitance. This is because C2 is composed of the condenser core as well as the ‘surroundings of the bushing’, determined by the geometry of the transformer turret and other components. As a result, higher C2 deviations can be expected, i.e. up to ±50% from the routine test value. In case of a potential tap for IEEE bushings, influence of stray capacitance is significantly reduced since capacitance C2 of the potential tap is dominated by the last two grading layers. Fig. 8 illustrates the influence of stray capacitance on C2 in the case of a potential tap and a test tap, respectively.

Power factor is an ageing parameter for OIP bushings and is also influenced by temperature. In the case of RIP bushings, an increase in power factor is an indication of humidity ingress but the value is temperature dependent as well. Table 1 summarizes the above relevant evaluation parameters and the factors that influence these values.

bushings Evaluating Reliability of Bushings Relevant Parameters to Evaluate OIP RIP Bushings
Table 1: Relevant Parameters to Evaluate OIP & RIP Bushings.
CLICK TO ENLARGE